Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Segal

I am very sad to see folks take away very important information from users that see value in this information. I would like to make it known that she had a tumor at the end of her life and her "depersonalization" was an entirely different event. She is being called low notability by WLU. Someone new to the SUBJECT is not to be defined as such when their work is very important to "people concerned". In this case people "Suffering" the effects of "depersonalization" are in a crisis and it is not a laughing matter nor an academic matter to "DELETE" information that others deem important for their problem: information that may HELP these people better understand the crisis or disorder. Suzanne Segal got training in this area while she suffered this disorder and I think this makes her a "notable" person. I would like WLU to show your credentials and any other knowledge you have about this subject. THIS IS NOT A LAUGHING MATTER. If you are interested in some reviews of her book go here. http://www.vedicbooks.net/collision-with-the-infinite-p-520.html It is my belief that WLU "needs to be stopped" from destroying information other folks would like to read. PLEASE... review most of his "deletes" and recontruct the "vandalism" that is being done. I saw other folks argue with him about this same "destructive deletes"...not constructive deletes. THANK YOU...kindly...I wish to be able to use Wikipedia....without "MISSING INFORMATION". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanlegg (talk • contribs)
 * The deletion discussion is over, posting here is pointless. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 01:45, 14 April 2011 (UTC)