Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Swadhin Axom

Discussion
@Chaipau @Vina-iwbot~enwiki @ SameerKhan @Ramitmahajan @Srikeit @Planemad @Robchurch @Arjayay @ Lionel Messi Lover  @Toweli @Chatsyde @Haoreima @Sinlung123 @Moonriddengirl @MatthewVanitas tagging to contribute in discussion  Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 19:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * This looks like it is WP:SOAP. It deserves a discussion in the article on ULFA, though. Chaipau (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Tagging to contribute in POV Nomination
@Vanderwaalforces I feel like this article has a lot of first and second degree sources, alongside that of well reputed journals both UGC and International ones. I feel it contributes significantly to wikipedia, as wikipedia should always be unbiased. There are other pages on countless such insurgent movements and proposed countries from other parts of the world. So I feel it would be unfair to delete it. Article can however be modified


 * a simple search in google scholar and jstor will yield significant results. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=Swadhin+Axom&hl=en&as_sdt=0,33
 * also have included newspaper archives as well

It appears the original nominee was against this article, because of him being an Indian Nationalist. I understand, I am indian as much as you, however we must understand that we have to include all sides of the political landscape. Wikipedia is not a place to cherry pick, you cannot delete all articles that might be contentious on India.

I have stated it many a times that in order to maintain neutrality, would suggest editing existing articles based on your arguments, using credible sources, instead of plain WP:I just don't like it. Wikipedia should never become a battleground of political ideologues. If you read the article its neutral, you can add additional pointers in the article, if you have sources for the same. Thanks Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Flyingphoenixchips Hi there. I don’t think it is appropriate to tag users into discussions in this manner, it looks disruptive. This is an AfD discussion and it there’s a reason for this article it would be determined in this discussion. Also, relevant people that might have interest in this discussion would be notified via deletion sorting. Try to express your own concern in the AfD discussion. Regards, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Alright thank you very much. Will keep that in mind Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 20:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Tagging to contribute in discussion
@Axone213 Your input will be valuable thank you Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Karnataka Tagging for inputs in POV based deletion nomination Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)