Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sword of Moonlight: King's Field Making Tool

And another thing
No one was trying to have a debate for debate sake here. The debate served to clean up the page somewhat but otherwise it was an exercise in idiocy. First of all the sources on the page were good enough and better than most low-importance video game related articles. If you want bullet proof sources, get a ticket to Japan and start digging around in peoples houses for old magazines. The importance of sources varies from wikipedia wiki to wiki. Most Japanese pages I read on ja.wikipedia are completely unsourced. Sources are not even an issue until someone comes along and disputes some basic information in a way that can't be resolve. Deleting pages on these grounds is failing to provide people with basic information in Wikipedia form, and people are the people who make wikipedia. So its just antisocial of the lowest order when there is not even a need for sources in the first place.

If software being good and popular is not enough for people to be able to find basic information about it on wikipedia... especially when non-commercial elements (without an advertising incentive and usually no budget for advertising) are involved. Then that is severely curtailing the usefulness of wikipedia, and presents a radical bias in terms of wikipedia's content.

Anyway, I will be recreating this page in not long, and am prepared to have a meta conversation about the entire point of the video game "project" under these circumstances purely because I respect Wikipedia and depend upon it as a valuable resource, and don't want to see it hampered in this way by misguided editors--Truth Glass (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Reference copy
Here User:Truth_Glass/Sword_of_Moonlight:_King's_Field_Making_Tool is a reference of the page in question. And there goes any argument for the page not being worthy of space on Wikipedia's servers.--Truth Glass (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)