Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Systems' Approach for Interpreting Horoscopes (2nd nomination)

Human Beings are stupid, they need secondary sources to validate the primary. Open your eyes, the source itself is the reason for the river. True Knowledge does not need validation by secondary, coz knowledge is the source and it is the end. You havent seen an electron and you believe in your existence. Amit Patnaik.... Falls Church VA, USA.
 * 1) The best and most exhaustive astrology book website on the Web states (read the reviwers comments on VKC)
 * 2) Terry thanks her teacher VK Choudhry
 * 3) Some Software Company make Software Specifically for SA (Hey they dont make things for free)
 * 4) Random site dealing with remedial measures from various schools of astrology cites SA.
 * 5) Random astrologer
 * 6) Another software development company
 * 7) Yet another Software Company ( How many more is needed)
 * 8) Reference GOOGLE books
 * 9) Random Site
 * 10) Random astrologer
 * 11) Random astrologer in other technique learns SA
 * Indeed, true knowledge doesn't need any validation. The problem of pure truth is that it can't be formulated by observers that know neither everything nor nothing. This is why one has to choose a truth model. Wikipedia has chosen one in which your claims of truth don't hold. Deal with it. --Tinctorius 18:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)