Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/TVC Capital

Edit conflict
Reply to • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It does indeed say that an example of trivial coverage (non-significant coverage) is a "passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization." Consider the five sentences I've already quoted.  There is no "quoted person" in these five sentences.  This is not a quote of someone that mentions in passing where the person works.  This is not a "passing mention".  Do you agree that these five sentences are not a "passing mention"?  Unscintillating (talk) 01:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply to Smmurphy(Talk) 18:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, "brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business" is what you meant. Are you seeing brief announcements here?  As for the word "routine":
 * routine communiqués announcing such matters as the hiring or departure of personnel,
 * routine notices of facility openings or closings (e.g., closure for a holiday or the end of the regular season),
 * routine notices of the opening or closing of local branches, franchises, or shops,
 * There is one more "routine" mentioned, but I reject that "routine restaurant reviews" is an example of trivial coverage, and I've previously removed this entry from the list. Back to "routine", is $225 million "routine".  My initial reaction to Cunard's sourcing was indeed a rejection, but as I read what he had to say, I had to accept that he was correctly representing the intent of our policies.  This is when I decided to rework the article, to remove any latent argument that it was somehow advertising.  Unscintillating (talk) 01:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)