Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/TV Tropes Wiki (2nd nomination)

Comments after closing
This is truly not worth fighting over, so I'm letting it drop, but I fail to see the point of adding comments after a closed discussion (especially with edit summaries like that last one, which was the real reason I reverted). If you want the article undeleted, take it to DRV. Otherwise, you're just complaining without trying to fix anything; that's a waste of everyone's time, including yours.  Anturiaethwr  Talk 18:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * One, it's called catharsis. Maybe you should read Wikipedia instead of editing it unfairly. Deletionists should be deleted. — trlkly 01:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Just in case you are wondering, the mistake you made was a common one. You promoted an essay to guideline status in order to disregard the (lack of) consensus, thus outing yourself as a deletionist. I'm not saying the article should have stayed, but an admin should be able to quote actual policy or guidelines (or at least link them) when making a decision. Oh, and the last line above is a joke. — trlkly 01:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Moved from project page

 * These comments were added after the project page discussion was closed, as as such, have been moved here.

Instead of quibbling over whether or not it should be kept, why don't we find some way to make it notable? 69.61.187.92 (talk) 01:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Glad to know administrators are still doing their job at upholding consensus on deletion debates. This isn't why I left Wikipedia, not at all. -67.180.32.48 (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC)