Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Taharrush gamea

This page will be transcluded into other pages. Only level 4 subsections make sense in this context. Pldx1 (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC) This comment was moved (together with some other comments) by someone else. And now, the striked comment does no more reflect the situation. In fact, the following messages will NOT been transcluded, and are NOT accessible from the Articles for deletion/Log/2016 January 12. Not taking responsability for this. Pldx1 (talk) 08:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

From the Talk page of the article
First of all, I agree with some wikipedians about the political use of this article, it's obvious from the get go of the talk page and the comments in this page. Secondly, In my opinion it doesn't warrant an independent article so it's better to merge it with related ones.

this is a copy/past of my comment on the talk page of the article

Why not Egypt page?

Seems to me the article's focus is in Egyptian society, politics media and culture, and allowing its specificity, why not move it to a paragraph about crime in the Egypt article? even the translations of the arabic words are in the Egyptian dialect characterized by the use of "G" as the phonic equivalent of the Arabic letter "ج" instead of "j" in classical Arabic. Happy birthday Wikipedia and community.

Amanouz (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Amanouz. The wrong transcription in the BKA report spread quickly, probably it gets a neologism. Fight in deWP is ongoing as said. Best wishes to you. The article in Egypt could use some extension based on the sources quoted here. Polentarion Talk 15:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)