Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tahir Abbas (2nd nomination)

Looking at the history edits this article seems to have been hijacked – rewritten to focus on the subject’s negative points, education and irrelevant family history etc and including the unsubstantiated THES story which is based on the unreliable comments of one person who NOT independent of the case and arguably in breach of confidentiality in relation to it. The original THES piece has had 129 comments as of 16 December 2009. More than any other in the history of THES – surely this is no accident, but in fact confirms the malicious and calculated damage it is meant to do – and this is now subject to legal action81.152.48.246 (talk) 23:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

the THE story is based on one person’s comments, and arguably someone who has breached confidentiality and was the subject of a race-victimisation grievance for harassing, bullying and intimidating Abbas. Therefore, it is totally unreliable as well as factually incorrect.

That because the wiki page is first on a google search it means that people will read it first and come to negative conclusions about Abbas, aside from the fact that it only contains open source views and perspectives, which are selectively interpreted. They are not the prominent views of Abbas at all, far from it. That the wiki page is wholly and professionally damaging to a leading figure – whose entire future is in jeopardy because of this bias in one article and because of the prominence given to it in wiki – it inadvertently legitimises a negative campaign by people who wish to discredit him. The original THES piece has had 129 comments as of 16 December 2009. More than any other in the history of THES – surely this is no accident, but in fact confirms the malicious and calculated damage it is meant to do. The THE article is subject to a legal action as we speak and therefore Abbas cannot speak out publicly against it just yet.

This whole campaign is based on jealousy and to discredit Dr Abbas. Sayartsabid (talk) 01:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If you have concerns about the content of the article, I encourage you to take them to the talk page of that article. I don't think anyone would want an untrue claim about plagiarism to appear in an article like this, and if there are sources that show that it is untrue then the article can be edited.  Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)