Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tate Snyder Kimsey Architects

Nice rewrite but I still think it was prematurely closed without feedback from the opposing sides. I am not into the "wikipedia politics" so I won't take the time to go through the hassle of re-listing this. I figured we would trust those with authority in playing their role reasonably in representing the rest of us without authority, and, even when they fail (and they have, as we all do) to learn from their mistakes and represent the powerless better next time. It is also expected that, (much like good politicians) they be well versed in the policies and guidelines and when this representation fails, that they take action in fixing it. I am not strongly opposed to this article but agree that there is still discussion to take place about it and its place on an encyclopedia is still debatable. I am not in favor of a keep just as much as I am not in favor of a deletion, though I think more consensus was needed in this case. -- Lo uk ⟟n ho  ≟ 20:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I've no axe to grind against the company either, but I agree the AfD was closed prematurely, before comment could be made on the article re-write. It was clearly not a cut-and-dried decision, so I asked the closing admin to expand on their reasoning. Overall, the company has some notability, though personally I'm not convinced they pass WP:NCORP. But I'll let the matter rest. Sionk (talk) 22:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)