Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Technopathogenology

Keep The argumentation to delete seems not enough founded. The people that vote for deletion have not some Bibliography on Technopathogenology.They vote but they do not read on the subject?They vote "delete" without a previous scientific discussion? which is the qualification "on the subject" of the people that say "Eguiazu invented a therm .... I think they must read a lot of articles and then vote.there are a lot of scientific articles on the subject.The term was not invented.The term was the definition of a previous phenomen. Do you think perhaps exists a better term for this phenomen? If you find a better term please use it!!!! Wikipedia must have a term to describe the phenomen.The phenomen have the same right to be described as a lot of untrascendent terms that are already in wikipedia

The term and the subsecuent phenomen will survive the deletion.A 4 inchs place in Wikipedia is not very extensive.If you do not include them is not more than becausse is an unpollitically term .Is not a place reason. Thank you very much an the persons that have voted the deletion.It confirms the entity of the term. A technopathogenologist