Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Terren Peizer (2nd nomination)

Request for clarification on closing notes
The rationale contradicts. You cited strong delete votes. What weight did you assign to the arguments and the rewrite, what was rough consensus, and what policy did you weigh? Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I was about to step out so I kept the close message short but instead of saying "few strong delete votes" it should have read "no strong delete votes." I see no delete vote from an established editor and the anon comments seem to stem mostly from "I don't like him" and "There are a million like him" which I didn't really give much weight. Also I didn't feel the subject qualified for WP:BLP1E, being involved Prometa, Milkin, and a few other minor things. The rewrite helped establish this clearer and made for a much better article than when it was nominated. Basically I closed as keep because the main argument for deletion, WP:BLP1E, was nullified after the rewrite and I saw virtually no good reasoning in the other delete comments. —[ DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs ] 19:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes the BLP1E was nullified after the rewrite, reason why I withdrew the nomination. Thank you for clearing your notes up. NonvocalScream (talk) 23:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)