Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Terry (Fawlty Towers)

Indentation
I boldly reverted an indentation "fix" which appears to change the meaning, or at least the intended addressee. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I was attempting to aim my comment to Flying Fische if that helps Carl Sixsmith (talk) 20:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought, and that's what I changed. I suggest that Sergeant Cribb reads Help:Using talk pages. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  Chief Counting Officer  ─╢ 20:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * And I suggest that TreasuryTag not change other people's comments in such a way as to change their apparent intention without being sure that he is correct. I further suggest that he make use of the talk page to discuss such actions.  WP:BRD might be useful here.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 20:52, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * How might WP:BRD be useful? has stated that he intended his comment to be indented the way I did it. So who do you think I should enter into discussion with before implementing this? You? ╟─ Treasury  Tag ►  directorate  ─╢ 21:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Carl, of course. You made the change without knowing what he meant (your guess was right as it turned out).  He confirmed his intentions because I raised the point, after you made the change, as you are surely aware.  Since you seem unclear about this, let me spell it out.  It is not in general a good idea to change other peoples comments in such a way as to change their apparent meaning without checking that you are right, even if it turns out later that you are.  If you make a Bold change which is Reverted, it is a good idea to Discuss them in a civil way.  Is that clear?   Sergeant Cribb (talk) 06:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Please don't tell me to be civil while being patronising and threatening yourself. Now let me see if I have this right: bold was me fixing the indentation. Revert was you putting it back. Subsequently, Carl confirmed that he meant it the way I did it, so I simply fixed it again rather than discussing because there was nothing to discuss . I'm not wasting any more time on this issue with you. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  person of reasonable firmness  ─╢ 07:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "Threatening"? Please explain.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "I'm not wasting any more time on this issue with you." ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  First Secretary of State  ─╢ 16:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. No need to apologise.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 16:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "I'm not wasting any more time on this issue with you." ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  Acting Returning Officer  ─╢ 16:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)