Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Amara Sulya Freedom Movement

The point of view aspect comes into picture, wherein one takes into consideration the Memorials aspect. Memorial is a "structure established to remind people of an event." But, in the case of the two locations mentioned in the poorly drafted article, the first subheading mentions about an unspecific flag, contrasting the poor article is a structure of a lighthouse! So, at a first glance, the poor article seems to be done just for the sake of doing rather than contributing anything productive to the encyclopedia. Such content where contrast is evident must not spam global platforms such as this.

The user BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU seems to be related to the topic, as he has put forth his opinion as fact. Thus making it an open act of self-serving bias and conflict of interest. This contradicts Wikipedia's editing rule which states that, an article must be impartial. Unfair practice by that user with regard to this practice. Noah B. Smith (talk) 18:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)