Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Fetish List

This article will be cleaned up/referenced etc. Just give me a bit of time!

And what i'm wondering is how all you people got to this page within five minutes of it being created, and instantly tried to get it deleted! What on earth were you searching for that got you on to a page of made up fetishes???

Anyway the article will be wikified given time.

Just hold you horses! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanmarsden (talk • contribs)


 * It only takes one person to flag it and the rest just takes its course. Please consider holding your horses and review WP:V and WP:NFT, before creating an article. Thanks. PJM 13:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * As the nominator, and since I have been asked to justify myself, and to ensure newbies are not bitten, I was simply browsing Recent Changes.
 * The article seemed unduly long for a new article and I looked at it because of that. I'm "just another editor" like you are and I was looking to see if the article was worthy of inclusion.  My opinion was "not".  AfD is the right place to handle this since it puts the article up for peer review, and gives other editors time to work on the article and save it if that is possible.
 * I'm glad you are watching the article and will improve it. I fear it will take a great deal of work to improve it sufficiently, but others may disagree.  Good luck with the editing.  I hope you achieve your goal.
 * Fiddle Faddle 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I know, I'm just a time waster. The article's complete crap. It will not be wikified - EVER. It is a gargantuan slice of irrelevant nonsense. Thank you for the time you wasted.

Regards, Alan.