Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Literati Quarterly (2nd nomination)

I would say the zeal to delete this page considering other less sources pages without third-party sources sighted shows a systemic bias on the part of the person requesting deletion considering that request for deletion was denied less than 24 hours prior. The publication has obviously grown since trying to have a page last year. Again, how is this publication any less signifigant than others established in the same year? Zarbe2015 (talk) 13:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

From General notability guideline:

"If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.

"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it need not be the main topic of the source material.[1] "Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. "Sources"[2] should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected.[3] Sources do not have to be available online or written in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability."Zarbe2015 (talk) 20:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)