Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Luchagors (album) (2nd nomination)

Discussion of links as meeting WP:N
These are Theornamentalists's links, which I decided I would go through and check. The results are below.

MSJapan (talk) 22:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Amazon editorial review - anonymous review on Amazon, and we don't use commercial sites like Amazon as sources.
 * Stomp and stammer mag interview - maybe one paragraph on the CD, the rest is a brief rundown on how Dumas and Morton got to where they are at.
 * Change the record interview - nothing about the first album, more talking about the second, which has yet to be released.
 * Northern Ireland Culture music review - review of a club-size live show, not the album.
 * Atlanta boy mag - about Amy Dumas opening a wrestling-themed coffeehouse.
 * Distorted mag - club-size live show review, "magazine" is a blog.
 * Pittsburgh Music review - preview of the band, nothing related to the album at all.
 * Atlanta Magazine - article on Dumas, maybe three lines about the band, and there was no album at that point.
 * The Fabulous, Freaky, Unusual History of Pro Wrestling - book preview only, no relevant information locatable.
 * Map Magazine - announcement of a Luchagors concert that evening.
 * Allmusic Album Review - This was already mentioned in sources. However, AllMusic being what it is (a site for "all music", this alone should not confer notability.
 * What's now Atlanta? - another article on the same coffeehouse mentioned earlier, not the band or album.
 * Cleveland Scene Newsweekly - announcement of a club show.
 * CDBaby - commercial site that specializes in indie stuff, and has no relation to notability. I've gotten local band material from them for groups that in no wise meet local notability, much less WP's.
 * and her book - I've read the book, it came out prior to the band really doing anything.
 * their myspace/facebook/official page/etc - we don't use those as sources unless absolutely necessary, and they aren't sources independent of the band anyhow.
 * Thank you for going through, I agree with you on virtually every point, and regarding amazon/cdbaby/facebook/etc., I meant to show that there was information usable as supplements to the independent sources. I intended to show that the band is notable and not particularly the album. Some of the votes in this AfD asserted that the band was not notable, and I wanted to dispel that. However, it is my understanding that in most cases, if a band is notable their albums (not including demos, EPs, singles) are typically notable. I do think that this album can be well sourced to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. - Theornamentalist (talk) 22:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)