Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Pigeon (Canadian publication)

What is your definition of reliable source coverage? While it seems this publication is new, they appear to have produced solid content that no other "reputable" media organization has done. Plus, as someone who has worked in journalism, prestigious publications like the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation won't write about a media startup that describes itself as telling the stories that mainstream media won't; it would look bad on the well-known publication. This website reminds me of Canadaland, started by Jesse Brown in 2013. Most of the references on its Wikipedia page are directly from its own webpage. Are these sufficient citations for a website like Canadaland? If so, then why aren't they being applied to The Pigeon? It's also important to remember that university journalism is still reputable journalism. The Canadian Journalism Project (j-source) is quite reputable in the Canadian media landscape, and its writeup about The Pigeon goes pretty in-depth.