Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Word (newspaper)

 

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Word (newspaper) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Articles for deletion The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * WHY IS THIS DISCUSSION 3 YEARS OLD ?? snapfizz2018**

The Word (newspaper) The Word (newspaper) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats) (Find sources: "The Word (newspaper)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference) The article sites no references, with the website leading to a crowdfunding website, suggesting that the publication is in its early stages, and possible little notability. AxG / ✉ / 10 years of editing 20:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC) snapfizz-2018****
 * OUR PAPER HAS HAD 25 EDITIONS - THE CRITICISM IS INVALID - snapfizz2018 *****
 * WE ARE A NON-PROFIT ORGANISATION WITH A WEBSITE REFERenced TO AT THE WORDMEDIA.CO.UK

Delete For one it hasn't even printed a single copy yet (Still 6 weeks away!) Also, this is a crowd-funded paper. While that doesn't make it non-notable in it's own right, it doesn't help with this. Trying to find sources for this has been tricky and I don't see where this paper meets WP:GNG. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Delete – Difficult to look for coverage due to the generic name but the crowdfunding project currently has only £770 pledged and I couldn't turn up anything better. —Nizolan (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Delete as has not been published yet. Case of WP:TOOSOON. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC) Delete In agreement with above, not yet notable. Paste Let’s have a chat. 13:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

....SEE THE REFUTATIONS ABOVE - REINSTATE THE ARTICLE - IT IS A PUBLICATION AUTHORISED BY THE BRITISH LIBRARY ! snapfizz2018****
 * THESE CRITICISMS ARE INVALID AND 3-YEARS OUT OF DATE - HAVE SOME CONSIDERATION PLEASE !

=
======================================Snapfizz (talk) 05:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Snapfizz (talk) 05:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)