Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tim Patterson

Oh, shoot. Did I make a mistake by recreating this? There's a Tim Patterson involved in the Global warming controversy, I hope that's okay to write about him. If not, please don't complain to the arbcom but tell ME. I'm trying to be reasonable and accomodating. --Uncle Ed 01:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleted again as nothing notable was there - just being a university prof doesn't make one notable. And just because he was listed as a skeptic doesn't give him notability. ...reasonable and accomodating - hmm... creating stubs w/ no noteability seems to be part of the type of POV pushing behavior evidenced in the arbcom case - and you're still at it. Vsmith 14:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed: Tim Patterson, the prof who opposes AGW, is not notable. I should've prod'd the article myself as soon as I realized I had recreated an "article deleted because of non-notability". I stand corrected. --Uncle Ed 18:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)