Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Timeline: Philippine Standout Events (2006-2007)

I respectfully petition for NON-deletion of this article since most of the events thereat are fairly neutral and one of the top events in 2007

as PROOF:


 * Inquirer.net, top 10 Most Read Stories, Columns on INQUIRER.net in 2007

Our top newspaper Philippine Daily Inquirer just today, published the top events of 2007, above.

--Florentino floro (talk) 10:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I was invited to share my thoughts (Vide my talk page). As a just one year user / editor here, my passion is to create articles about law and Filipino events or persons which caught global attention or do have the impact, inter alia. Now, I created this 2006-2007 articles with simple tones; when it was first nominated for deletion, I submitted my points and argument, and the result was no consensus. Why? I tried my best to EDIT AND ADD therein the top Philippine papers' most read and watched news of these 2 years to make it Wikified. I spent TIMES. I reproduce the template here:

The archived things there stated: "Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page." I am sure that a 2nd nomination for deletion might be improper since it said that all further comments must be on the discussion page, but not on a new one like this. I respectfully petition therefore, for NON-deletion of this article since most of the events thereat are fairly neutral and one of the top events in 2007. As PROOF: *Inquirer.net, top 10 Most Read Stories, Columns on INQUIRER.net in 2007- Our top newspaper Philippine Daily Inquirer published the top events of 2007, above. I browsed about ON WHAT WIKI IS NOT as suggested by the Bot that notified me. I am sure, that I am entitled as creator of the article, to be given a Bill of Particulars that is, what sections or sub-sections of that Wiki rule inter alia did I or the article violate to merit deletion upon consensus or vote by the editors and admin here. While I admit that it is the first time I saw that there were 2 previous article already covering my article, still, my article satisfies very well the neutral and notable view of Wiki. There are lots of articles in Wiki that cover same thing, person or event example: Jesus, University of the Philippines, Ateneo de Manila. Many written articles on these overlap. WHEREFORE, premises consider, I ask that I be enlightened as to what rules of Wiki like What Wiki is not, inter alia, which makes my article squarely FOR DELETION. Thanks. -- --Florentino floro (talk) 08:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)