Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tony Ricca

Article shouldn't be for deletion
A consensus is needed here. The page is not a promotional page or bordering on a hoax. There has been no attempt to challenge its content from a user that has been told that their edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted plus repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Others have already challenged one or two users doing such. Images shown are from Wikimedia Commons. If I'm referred to one user to put up these images, it's compliant with the rules on Wikipedia. There are sources that need to be cited as you're unable to identify three sources as I have. They can be found in regional and local newspapers that show notability that aren't online. There are more and will be added. I look forward to your reply as this can be resolved. Georgivac (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)