Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tool (demo)

You Think Somebody's Gonna Bitch & Moan?
Wow. Some of those who voted for the article's deletion stated that they actually have copies of the demo, then have the decency to say that it's not notable. I wonder, have any of those guys ever heard of a device called a C-A-M-E-R-A. Taking a picture and uploading sed picture would verify it's existence, making the article worthy. Seriously, who's gonna complain? Nobody deletes stubs as long as those articles have confirmation of the object or event actually existing or happening. You wouldn't delete the article on Jesus or the article on the Roswell incident, SO WHY DELETE THIS ONE? So unless anybody has proof there with them that their God and Saviour actually exists, I suggest they delete the article on Jesus while they're deleting other articles on whatever. If this article should be deleted, then all other articles stating anything that might have a small chance of being untrue, should be deleted. Although Wikipedia would then be an empty encyclopedia. All articles have lies within. Deleting one article that contains lies or untrue statements warrants the deletion of the website and all it's contents, so seriously, think about this until you've found a reason why this article, and any other article should be deleted for being what Cliff Smith likes to call "unsourced". So take a look around Cliff. Ever find an article that has no untrue statements or references? No. You haven't. Nobody has. They don't exist. Do you actually think that people spend their entire time searching through articles, checking links and deciding whether THEY find it trust-worthy? If you do, then I genuinely feel sorry for you and whoever remotely resembles you. Hypothetically, I could replace a 'trust-worthy' link with a link to a fake website. Think anyone will bitch and moan? No. They, if they actually enjoy Wikipedia, will look for a valid link, and replace the link I originally placed there. So lets just say Jimi Hendrix denied ever playing guitar, would you delete that fact from his article? Don't think you would. So go ahead and ask Maynard if there was ever a Tool demo. Go on. I guarantee you he would say yes. In fact, there was most likely more than one demo produced. So go on, delete whatever articles you can get your annoying little hands on. Hopefully, and I'm not the only one hoping here, that one day, people like you will stop complaining over articles that might be about some "unsourced, non-notable demo", because it's fucking annoying. Tool-apc (talk) 01:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Have a look at WP:N.--PhilKnight (talk) 01:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry 'bout that comment above. Just felt angry! Tool-apc (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)