Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/TorFX

Could you please provide some guidance as to why this page is up for debate? In my opinion this page is both sufficiently informative and fair, so an explanation would be helpful as this page is not advertising. I have taken out the following line as an amend since the page was put up for discussion. “The Company’s headquarters are in Penzance, Cornwall where they sponsor the rugby team the Cornish Pirates.”
 * Being informative and fair is not enough. I accept that it may not be advertising but in my opinion it does not meet the criteria in WP:COMPANY, despite the ST Fast Track mention. It simply is not at all interesting or significant, apart from to the people who work there and own it of course. Are you connected with the company in any way? Philafrenzy (talk) 10:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Disappointed to find my article removed. The lack of grounds for deletion is also a concern, "not interesting" as a reply is very vague and unhelpful as surely every single article is uninteresting to people that have no first hand experience or interest of the subject. I have personally used this company and I thought the page would be very important for people like myself and people local to the company. I initially added the article after much research, also noting that similar companies with much less notability feature on wikipedia, like "UK Forex" "HiFX" "MoneyCorp" "Caxton FX" and "World First". I have lost faith in the content supplied on Wikipedia. Dannyjameswood (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)