Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Trains and Railways

I object to the deletion of theis article again fo the same reasons. According to the project page "No evidence of notability - seems extremely unlikely to have been or be notable. I should note that List of railroad-related periodicals already covers the basic details." this article is notable and the only reason it is on the other page, is because I added it. Futhermore the only online evide of the periodical is still the wiki article, and the copy of it saved a http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Trains_and_Railways by wiki user James Michael DuPont. I also believe its existance would benifit the Wikiproject Magazines. (Hurricane95 (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC))
 * Hi, it's normal to put your comments on the main page for the particular AFD - in this case it's Articles for deletion/Trains and Railways. See WP:DISCUSSAFD for more information on contributing to an AFD discussion. -- Red rose64 (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)