Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Travel Republic

Concerned that the size of this brand isn't being reflected in the content submitted so far. They are certainly notable but mainly in the UK (providing over 2 million holidays per annum). They are frequently mentioned by large UK news sites (https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/the-10-best-last-minute-travel-websites-8786559.html) but typically don't aggressively market the brand. Keen to understand the difference in notability between this page and similar brand pages such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Beach_(business) etc. Keen to understand if there is something simple I haven't grasped from the helpful articles I've been thus far referred to.
 * Wow, someone who actually uses the talk page on an AfD - kudos, better behaved than I (I'm a Comment user on the main AfD page myself). You might be right - although AfD !votes should be judged off the theoretical maximum notability, i.e. if you can find sources that make it notable that is sufficient, the article doesn't actually have to have that content in - it's that hunting that means AfD articles often improve during the process as a side effect.


 * Just as a side-note, please remember to add the ~ at the end of your post - otherwise once more than 2 people are discussing it makes it harder to refer to points :) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)