Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tropical Towerwars

Inzo I have no clue who you are, but obviously you have done 10 seconds work relating to this decision, and made a lazy decision, which holds absolutely no means under the rules for inclusion on Wikipedia. This actually has to be the single most idiotic thing I have seen in a extremely long time. Lets put this into a view that relates to the stupidity going on here:

PersonI finally gets through varsity, has had no jobs cause his love for the World of Warcraft which has bound his every free moment, he then goes looking for jobs only to find that everyone requires that he has already had six jobs; reference letters from each, a personnel recording from each respective owner as to his sound work ethic, the breakdown of the ROI he gave each respective company while working there, and just incase there was any uncertanty video footage of at least 80% of his working hours at each respective company. Then only would there be some, while still uncertain, notability as to him holding these six jobs. So due to this utter absurdity, PersonI retreats back to his hovel to live out the rest of his life in the World of Warcraft.

Sound a little stupid...well gee aint that just odd, cause we get the exact same impression from the joke of an article deletion proposal. Oh yeah, you caught us, we specially went and hacked an article onto softpedia (a VERY notable software site), quickly photoshopped some cool looking in game screenshots, made up a bunch of random rubbish about something that in actual fact its all just fake and we are just trying to post this on Wikipedia to bewilder the thousands of readers interested in Warcraft III custom maps.

I mean what more notability do you want? A group of 100 people knocking on your door with "I Love TTW" tattoos? There is a base development site, there are forums dedicated to it on other sites, there are discussion topics relating to it on NUMEROUS other sites, there are notable discussions made by 3rd party users on the TTW home site...honestly how ridiculous, I do ONE search on google, for just ONE relating phrase and find people asking about the game, discussing it on very notable 3rd party sites (GArena), I see people asking about it on Yahoo, I see a discussion about it on the mybboard community site, I can see community boards from various countries talking about it, I can see it on the extremetop100, gamerzplanet, dotastrategy....and so the list goes on?

So is all that fake, not notable or verifiable? ("The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability") I disagree strongly, and request that you please do your job properly.

We have fallen in line with "Notability requires verifiable evidence", our notability is not temporary,

Atrum-Amicus (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2009 (UTC)