Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Turkish Views of the So Called Armenian Genocide

I object the delition.150.210.226.2 17:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)I object the deletion of this page. I understand that wikipedia has a NPOV policy. I also understand and agree that this page would violate that policy to the extent that it gives voice exclusively to Turkish views. However, it is not fair to delete this page whereas at the same time there is a page called Armenian Genocide, and there is another page called Denial of Armenian Genocide. It is appalling that the editors here do not raise the NPOV policy objections to those pages and target solely the page in question (i.e. Turkish views). NPOV is a valid policy, but isn't the whole point that the articles should be fair? And how can an article be fair if it is titled as Armenian Genocide? The title assumes and forces the reader to assume that there was a genocide to begin with. And how about the even more egregious title Denial of the Armenian Genocide? Isn't that title explicitly saying that an Armenian Genocide did take place and those who say it didn't take place are simply "denying" it? Where is the fairness that the NPOV policy seeks to establish? I do not oppose the deletion of this article per se. But I do object the deletion of this page solely, whereas the other pages I mentioned above are not deleted or their title changed. I especially object to the presence of a page called denial of genocide, which taints Wikipedia's objectivity and fairness and policy against pushing a specific point of view. That's exactly what that title does. To sum, if Wikipedia wants to be fair (which is the purpose of having an NPOV policy in the first place), then it should either (1) delete or alter the title of all pages using the word "genocide" to describe the events that took place and the word "denial" to describe those who contest that what happened was genocide, or (2) accept that the other pages are also tainted with POVs and propaganda (soapbox to use the Wikipedia term), and therefore let this page be. In my opinion, at least this page is clearly saying that what you'll read represents the Turkish view. At least it does not claim that it is the truth and those who do not accept it are in 'denial'. In short, at least it is not insidiously trying to label one group deniers and the others proponents of truth.150.210.226.2 17:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)