Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Twomad

Deletion???
Who nominated this for deletion and why? Throwaway899 (talk) 21:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Me. WP:NN. He wasn't notable enough to have an article when he was alive 2 days ago - that doesn't change today now that he's dead. --Picard's Facepalm •  Made It So Engage! • 21:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * i love this reply 2A02:587:551A:8100:940D:18A6:FFA3:10FD (talk) 21:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If This article can exist on someone who nobody knows and has had zero impact then someone with 2.1 million subscribers on YouTube should be fine. Seawolf035 (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * While the article is certainly weak - your argument is even weaker. At least Holly is an elected official and "represents" an entire district within a state. That alone has significant impact by default. The article certainly needs to be improved. But if we are going to start saying that elected officials are NN - then there is a boatload of housecleaning that needs to be done. --Picard's Facepalm •  Made It So Engage! • 14:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Just want to add even though the page has been taken down already, Twomad isn’t notable enough to be listed on Wikipedia he barely ever made headlines in mainstream media before his death and the most attention he’s ever received was minor cameos in news montages when they were discussing the Zoom trolling phenomenon back in 2020-2021 era, his death hasn’t changed anything about this fact so while he is a big name on the Internet that doesn’t mean anything for this website in particular, that’s what Wikitubia is used for. InternetEnigma (talk) 00:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC)