Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ubersite

This is a load of shit.

WIKIPEDIA: A BUNCH OF ELITISTs?
SERIOUSLY, WAS IT SUCKING UP THAT MUCH BANDWIDTH TO HAVE A PAGE DEDICATED TO UBERSITE?

I MEAN, REALLY.

---

No, it was the act of a select few admins who used Alexa as their main reason for removing it in the first place. It's too bad that Alexa CANNOT BE USED as criteria for deletion (as stated in the deletion policy here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Search_engine_test#Alexa_test). Perhaps JHMM13 should rethink what he's done and post another Ubersite article (we know you were a user, douchebag. You last posted in '05.) either apologizing for what he's done and subsequently having the deletion reversed or rebutting this article: http://www.ubersite.com/m/95173

Fuck y'all,

Matt Maiorano http://www.ubersite.com/u/maiorano84

oh who cares anymore -rad

I think Maltese is the only one who cares - Awesome Face

There are much less informative and much more niche-oriented articles out there. The vandalism (if any) would have decreased significantly after the initial surge, as most people on Ubersite lose interest in things such as these quite quickly. After the Ubersite post dropped off the most heated list it would also drop from many of the minds of the Ubersite collective. This deletion is a shame. The article could have been a prime tool for those curious about Ubersite and Uberhistory but would be flamed to death if they asked such questions on Ubersite.

NerfHerder 00:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)