Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Urapopstar

At the end of the day. It's an online community, that has existed for many years, has had many members and much history.

People on various other places on the internet know of URAPOPSTAR, people talk about it on MSN and more. It's a game that has improved peoples artistical abilities.

Its history is something that people are interested in, and if someone were to read about a game called URAPOPSTAR somewhere else on the internet, I'd like to think that they wouldn't be denied the ability to read about it on an online encylopedia. Isn't that the point of such an encylopedia? To teach people.

I mean, the site has been featured in English press. http://news.scotsman.com/features.cfm?id=346932004

I think it has a perfectly legitimate right to be on this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamChrisH (talk • contribs)

Rights? Well, as much as we encourage free speech, there isn't any legal right to be on this site. No one is in position to make any demands. This requires community consensus. Act civil, and it might stay. -- Natalinasmpf 20:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)