Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Uwe Kils (3rd nomination)

Thank you for unblocking.
They are all single persons. Give us an address and we will send you certified copies of our IDs. None will work for WIKIPEDIA again.

I will bring soon written proof, that I received the HEISENBERG AWARD and the 500 000 VOLKSWAGEN FOUNDATION PRIZE, an EB-1 invitation for my whole family, and a book cited 115 times - http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Kils%2C+U%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 (out of 338) - http://www.ecoscope.com/biomass3.htm - another chapter in book http://www.ecoscope.com/polarbe2.htm, another http://www.ecoscope.com/naturwie.htm. His name was in 451 books - http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Kils%2C+U%22|%22Uwe+Kils%22&btnG=Search+Books - http://www.google.com/search?q=%22uwe+kils%22+-wikipedia+-wiki+-encyclopedia&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&safe=off&start=0&sa=N - 4 320 notes on GOOGLE A certified doctor degree you can find here http://www.uwekils.com/kils15.jpg. You can contact the CAU and they will send you a certified paper edition. For me it would be enough if you call me "Ocean Photographer" with a Doktor degree in Marine Biology, maybe leave the sources and one large image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Krill666.jpg - higher resolution: http://www.ecoscope.com/krill/krill3/index.htm - when I still worked, on my birthday 50, when I gave everything away, there were 22 875 pages with my name on worldwide, only being possible with my students - thank you for your time Uwe Kils  09:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So you are denying that the accounts exposed at Sockpuppet investigations/Kils/Archive are sockpuppets? Cirt (talk) 09:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC):
 * Just give us the mailing address of Jimbo and we will send certified IDs. They all asked that their accounts should be closed, many times. Nobody likes to be called a "Sockpupet". They had even pictures of them on their user pages - which had been erased. They are my scientists and secretaries, why are they not allowed to have a single opinion? But I asked them all to change their password and throw it away and never work under this name again. I ask you to close all suspected accounts but mine. Uwe Kils  10:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * There is a way to offer copyright permission to the Wikipedia Foundation, but that would be 100% separate of this issue. This is not the matter at hand. We're not doubting those materials exist, nor are the identities of any other persons of any interest. See the above question from editor Cirt. That investigation showed all users and accounts were using the same computer, and an appeal would have to start with trying to refute or further discuss that. I'd also highly suggest another read of User:Kils/Restriction so that we don't accidentally wander toward any of that. For the possible wellbeing of your colleagues I'd also highly recommend you cease in disclosing additional personal information. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 12:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I agreed on that already. Professor user:karina sina I have not seen her for 4 years. She is thousands miles away. She did not vote. Uwe Kils  13:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That account was created on 1 December 2009. Coincidence? Hardly. Fences  &amp;  Windows  14:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * But not by me. Please close it. I promised already that we will only use the kils account in the future and that nobody is allowed to work on my IP or machine or name and that I will obey the restrictions. I meant it only good giving information of our UHSE ELITE UNIVERSITY into the public domain, but we have all also on our servers. I have never seen a person behaving like user:cert, not even giving his scientiffic background I did not "Canvas", I only asked to vote. Nothing else. Uwe Kils  15:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it possible that she may have opened the account independently, to support an article on her former advisor, and we need to extend her good faith in this.   DGG ( talk ) 17:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Given the results at Sockpuppet investigations/Kils and the canvassing documented at User talk:Kils, I think that any single purpose accounts appearing here should be treated with a high level of suspicion. We may yet have patience with a contributor who is seriously confused and lingering hope they might stop acting disruptively in time to avoid an indefinite block.  I have no opinion on the notability of the article in question. Jehochman Talk 17:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)