Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/ViSalus

I have been all over this site trying to figure out how to raise this question. Needless, I am not computer literate and know nothing about using all these symbols, etc.

My question is fairly simple. When I looked up this page a few months ago it had been deleted. The main reason as I gathered from talk page was that it had unsubstantiated sources, read like a press release etc.

Tonight, I discover that a new page has emerged about this product.If original concerns were that company is a MLM (aka pyramid scheme) why is it on Wikipedia unless something more well-balanced or at least one that provides sources of criticism is part of article?

If you Google the name, you get minimum of 20 pages of spam saying how great product is, the articles are usually entitled "Is Visalus a Scam" Then it goes on to claim that it's not, brag about the founders, mention that it was bought by a Fortune 500 company blah blah blah.

I know nothing about the process of amending articles and it makes my head spin trying to figure out.

Seems to me if you include a reference to it as pyramid scheme, there s/b discussion in article (with solid references) so people don't accept article as 100% factual. Internet already overloaded with MLM get-rich schemes.BHSteve (talk) 23:50, 18 September 2012 (UTC)