Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Voting house

Authors response
I think that deletion in the first place was at best-- biased. If the powers that be don't want this article, it says more about them than about the topic.

In the draft I remained neutral and facts-based in the article.

I did not want to include opinions which is may be one of the reason nobody knew what this topic was about, that of course not knowing the import of a historical fact.

Either way, I'm not going to take any action until "you guys" decide what you want to do.

Like I said deletion of this article about black and rural America and the role of Voting Houses in them, says more about Wikipedia and then about the topic. I gave my reasons in the request refund. 72.76.109.43 (talk) 02:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Rechtman here again with a PS.
 * The voting house is like the voting version of the Green Book. And if you have to look up "Green Book" to understand what I am saying that's all the convincing I need to show the implicit bias. 72.76.109.43 (talk) 02:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Your personal attacks on fellow editors who might not be from the US or familiar with one specific race-centric term from a certain era is noted. DMacks (talk) 23:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)