Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (4th nomination)

Bizarre. This site "attacks and outs wikipedians" but it has its own entry in wikipedia. If it's kept for "notability", then there are 2 other "attack sites" that are "attack and out wikipedians" that have been metioned in multiple reliable sources and so would be notable on that criteria. Ether delete this site as an "attack site" if links to it and other such deemed sites are not allowed. Apply consistent criteria across the board, something that most active wikipedia admins seem to have trouble doing, especially if they are "personally" involved or their original RFA nominators/supporters are involved. Piperdown 16:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)