Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/William Sledd (2nd nomination)

Bold textDELETE: I believe we should look at this article not so personally, but with a/an professional/encyclopedic view. For those who like the article, we must set aside articles that represent a more personal 'page' and a more biographic (sp) page backed by notability and supporting resources. Remember this "no evidence of independent external sources; nothing to demonstrate notability outside YouTube" -Walton monarchist89. If this article were to have these two items INSIDE of the article, then we probably wouldn't be having this discussion...--AJ42 11:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Then tell me what makes these youtubers so special. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_Dorm_Boys Why do they rate a wikipedia article, but not William Sledd? I demand an answer. James Allen Starkloff 75.89.17.161 23:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Why is "Pleasantview" trying to comment about topics he knows nothing about? The subject has, in fact, been featured numerous times in national press/media outlets. , a cursory search will educate those like Pleasantview. (Sorry, the chill pill kicked in 3 years later.) DMCer 03:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Here's my response to this disgrace. http://youtube.com/watch?v=2Mg1aKVKPKQ James Allen Starkloff151.213.162.165 18:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)