Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/World Science Day for Peace and Development

"Secondary sources"
Hey User:Cordless Larry, I know you have an interest in this subject matter too: please note the supposed plethora of secondary sources added by User:Concertmusic: here. Yes, I don't see it either. This AfD closed as "keep" by default; I guess I should have followed it more closely. I just removed all those primary sources and the mission statement. The only "secondary" sources is this meaningless puff piece from International Business Times, whose awards aren't journalistic but come from businesses. Anyway, I wonder if this should just be nominated again. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes,, it seems that the promised secondary sources weren't in fact secondary. This UNESCO project, which the WMF funded, has created so much cruft to be cleaned up by regular editors. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)