Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Xtian de Medici

Dear Jake Brockman, I completely understand the lack of sources and I did take that into consideration when submitting the information and creating the Xtian de Medici page but I also considered the fact that the company was founded only three years ago. I am new to the Wiki community and the practices but I am trying to learn as quickly as possible. Please, if you could help me reference or write a better article I would appreciate it. I gathered as much as I could from Google sources.

Sincerely thanking you in advance. Kim Marfil
 * thanks for your note. I would help if I could, however I did not find sufficient reliable sources that could be added to the article to establish notability. One of the main principles of Wikipedia is that the encylopaedia is not a collection of everything that exists, but of things/people, etc for which notability can be established and what can be reliably verified with appropriate sources. From that, it follows if notability cannot be established in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, articles may be deleted. I did initially consider redirecting Xtian de Medici to Gunner de Medici as it is indicated that Xtian is also a synonym for Gunner/Christian and that his personal brand and his fashion brand are closely related. However while looking at the article for Gunner, I was not overly sure if that is sufficiently referenced for notability either, following notability guidelines for pornographic actors. I may need to look into that a little further. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Dear Jake Brockman, again many thanks for any and all help you can provide. I did add two or three more sources to the article that I could find from google sources but because his fashion label is fairly new, I assume that is probably the main reason for the lack of sources. Because I am new to the Wiki community my question is what does one do in a case like this? Do you wait for more time to pass so that more sources build up and more article can be referenced? I have noticed when reading other "designer" articles, you will have an article that is just a few lines where it appears that for every new source that comes out it is then added and then I have seen "bios" that are very lengthy but have been flagged for insufficient sources. In other words I have followed those sources and found that in more cases than not, the sources were from major magazine and newspaper articles. I apologize for my lack of experience but i'm just trying to understand the protocols. Who or what determine the reliable sources and whether or not they are sufficient?

Thank you so much for all your help. Kim Marfil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kim Marfil (talk • contribs) 13:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)