Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Zergling

These should've been redirected to their appropriate races. Bp28 20:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The consensus was delete, not merge and redirect, so you are completely wrong about that. I doubt, however, that anyone would object if you created said redirects yourrself. Indrian 20:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Concensus deletion pff.....
ya based on how many people voting??? don't you spot the bias here? obviously if it's a mass amount of articles it has to have a parent level in which the parent's parent level is the StarCraft universe. -- Storkian aka iSoroush Talk  23:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * btw its two against one for deletion now, so that's another bias, move this conflict to merging section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Storkian (talk • contribs) 23:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a democracy; consensus was reached at the time, a decision was made and enacted, and that was that. If you feel that consensus was wrong, you can certainly bring the deletion up for deletion review. From what I see, you would probably contest that the deletion was in error--but, unless much has changed since the original review, a new consensus is likely to also be "delete", so I would personally advise against it. If you feel differently, though, you are welcome to do so. Ourai  тʃс 03:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)