Wikipedia talk:Articles for improvement/Archive 20

A curious thing about downvoting a nom
Hi, y'all. I noticed something curious yesterday. Noms that do not receive three net !votes (or any comments) while a 21-day clock is running "time out" and automatically self-destruct. A bot removes them. However, if a nom is on its 20th day of inaction and somebody throws an Oppose !vote, the 21-day clock restarts.

This seems counterproductive to the process. Would the solution be to have a late-breaking Oppose !vote be ignored as far as the 21-day clock goes? It would still count as a downvote but it would not restart the 21-day clock. Let's discuss it.

PS: I feel the 21-day clock should be extended to 31-days as that is about how much time it takes for noms to be properly noticed. Maybe we'all need more reminders to vote on noms? I know I forget to. Cheers! 17:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Extending the nom time sounds like a good idea; I'd be interested to know what other users think of this. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 21 of 2016
The selection for week 21 (starting 23 May 2016) is Whirlpool.

Discussion (week 21)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Reasons for opposing a nom
Northamerica1000 just opposed the nomination of several articles I had nominated, saying that the articles were too well developed and that there wasn't enough that needed to be done to fill up a week. I don't understand that. Those articles clearly needed some work, and could have benefited from some additional material. I don't understand leaving fairly well developed articles that have several hundred page views per day in mediocre shape. I don't think the reason that there is not enough work to fill up a week is a good one. So what if it takes only four days to fix it up? Then we will be left with a really good article, making WP look better in the long run. Now, with no chance of their being looked at by editors who are good at copy-editing, fixing references, improving formatting, adding relevant material, and finding good images, it will be a long time before those articles are improved. We're consigning them to indefinite mediocrity. If this topic has already been discussed and consensus reached, I apologize. If not, then I'd like to hear additional opinions. – Corinne (talk) 00:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * No need to apologise, . In this case I would say the Oppose votes are based on the sheer number of articles on Wikipedia, even those with high page views, that need improvement: TAFI should ideally be both highly visible and of very poor quality, even compared to other articles that need improving. I hope this helps. Thanks, Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Although it would be nice to improve decent articles on important topics to good or featured article quality, I believe that it would be best to focus on the poor-quality yet important articles first. GA and FA are great, but usability (that means no fluff, POV, or dearth of information) is more valuable. Esquivalience  t 02:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 22 of 2016
The selection for week 22 (starting 30 May 2016) is Photodetector.

Discussion (week 22)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 23 of 2016
The selection for week 23 (starting 06 June 2016) is Hilton Hotels & Resorts.

Discussion (week 23)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Notification subscription improvements
I would like to propose two modifications to the weekly notification delivery system:


 * Collapse-box it by default (or have an option to do that). These things are huge and distracting.

Honestly, I would have clicked "Not important enough" on probably 70% of the ones I've seen so far; way too many pop-culture topics (actors, songs, foodie trivia, etc.). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Include a feedback mechanism with options that help TAfI understand what the reactions are to the choices is offers, guiding more productive selections in the future:
 * &#9744; On it!  &#9744; Interested   &#9744; Maybe   &#9744; Too busy   &#9744; Too unfamiliar   &#9744; Too controversial   &#9744; Not important enough


 * Regarding the first point, adding a collapse button would be fine with me, but I'm not for collapsing the entire template by default. This may reduce participation in the articles, because people won't immediately see the weekly entry. North America1000 20:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Ozone layer
It seems like the current TAFI selected article has already appeared as TAFI in 2013. How come? And what are our general policies about this? BabbaQ (talk) 23:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * See - Evad37 &#91;talk] 03:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 24 of 2016
The selection for week 24 (starting 13 June 2016) is Shelby Gem Factory.

Discussion (week 24)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 25 of 2016
The selection for week 25 (starting 20 June 2016) is List of aqueducts in the Roman Empire.

Discussion (week 25)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

* Error Sorry, for the sidebar image, I picked: File:01 Pont d'Aël, Aosta Valley, Italy. Bridge Arch.jpg and I suspect that either I goofed up or WP does not like this unusual file name? And I do not know how to delete/undo or change to another image. Help please. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 00:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, . I am not seeing the error. Do you have a Permalink or Diff? Ping me back. Cheers!  20:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello It looks like the bot cleared the mistake. It's no longer there. — JoeHebda • (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Bot failure on WP:TAFINOM
See. There was an entry missing a level-3 heading and one that was lacking a timestamp. In both cases the bot errored out and never processed subsequent entires. I have fixed this, so the bot will continue to process the page in it's entirety. It is possible for the bot to generate a human-readable "report" of any issues it encounters, much like it does for PermClerk, but that seems a bit overboard for this otherwise simple bot task. So just be mindful that if the bot seems to be ignoring a particular nomination, it's probably due to incorrect formatting that the bot is unable to parse. Thanks! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 26 of 2016
The selection for week 26 (starting 27 June 2016) is Home page.

Discussion (week 26)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 27 of 2016
The selection for week 27 (starting 04 July 2016) is Answering machine.

Discussion (week 27)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 28 of 2016
The selection for week 28 (starting 11 July 2016) is Rye.

Discussion (week 28)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 29 of 2016
The selection for week 29 (starting 18 July 2016) is Sun deck.

Discussion (week 29)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 30 of 2016
The selection for week 30 (starting 25 July 2016) is Squeegee.

Discussion (week 30)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 31 of 2016
The selection for week 31 (starting 01 August 2016) is History of the constellations.

Discussion (week 31)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Minimum page views count?
I haven't !voted at WP:TAFINOM until today, but I see there are a lot of very unpopular pages being nominated. I would think popularity would be a driving force; I personally don't feel that compelled to contribute to a week-long effort knowing it's only going to be appreciated by a handful of people daily. There are millions of articles, surely we can find something more worthwhile. Additionally there is a very large backlog of approved articles for improvement that will take nearly 6 years to get through at our current rate, so overall our approval criteria couldn't hurt to be more stringent.

How do you feel about setting a minimum pageviews count? I was thinking at least several hundred views, if not at least a thousand &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  05:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Min pageview per what? Per day? Per month? If per month, maybe. Per day would just be too much. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 01:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Per day, the figure we currently put in TAFI nom. I'm thinking a thousand is too much. It's true that the more visible articles are likely to be more developed. Settling my proposal at a minimum 100 pageviews a day. That can be calculated as the average over the past 20 days or more using the "page views stats" link. At the bottom of the tool it shows the average daily hits. That tool I incidentally wrote; rest assured there is no bias with this proposal &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay. But I was just thinking about some things such as Dishwashing liquid, where although not searched often is relatively well-known to everyday life. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 00:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Dishwashing liquid appears to attract over 400 daily pageviews, which I think is sufficient. You will likely find the same to be true for other everyday topics &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I support taking page views into account. This can be accomplished by 's proposal or by individuals registering opposition to nominations with few page views. The latter seems to be more simple and more flexible. ~Kvng (talk) 14:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Could say that too. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 01:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

MUCH better lately
Thanks for taking serious my, and I assume others', complaints that the focus on low-importance pop-culture topics late last year and early this year was inappropriate. The topic selections recently and forthcoming seem much more like what we should be working on (and for the first time in a while now, I was inspired to spend over an hour working on this week's AfI). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  18:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I fixed broken and incomplete citations, fixed an issue with one of the images (the exports treemap - had to upload a new version of the image), and imposed consistent citation and date formats in the absence of either. This strikes me as something we should remind people about. If the TAfI user-talk invites included something like "Please be mindful of any English-language variety, date format, or citation style already consistently used at the article.", that would probably do the trick.  It's not going to be a good thing for TAfI to draw lots of random editorial attention to an article if one of the side effects of it is random mess of conflicting styles and formats.  The camper and hiker motto applies here: Leave the place cleaner than when you found it.  :-)   — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  06:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Sun deck
Sun deck is a redirect to Deck (ship). Always has been as far as I can tell. The TAFI banner is on Deck (ship). Why are we saying we're working on Sun deck, a redirect? ~Kvng (talk) 22:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It was nominated as a stub, before it was deleted at AFD and subsequently recreated as a redirect - Evad37 &#91;talk] 00:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect is what I came here to point out too too, but I disagree with redirecting to Deck (ship). A sundeck can surely be other places than a on a ship. See also Articles for deletion/Sun deck (August 2015). Nb. Redirect was created 1 Sept 2015 . 220  of  Borg 03:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you can find enough sources to provide notability, the redirect could be made into an article again. - Evad37 &#91;talk] 11:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 33 of 2016
The selection for week 33 (starting 15 August 2016) is Archaeological record.

Discussion (week 33)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 34 of 2016
The selection for week 34 (starting 22 August 2016) is Spanish West Indies.

Discussion (week 34)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Semi-protected articles
Where do we stand on semi-protected articles? I wanted to nominate Ball but I'm not sure if this is appropriate for this project.--CSJJ104 (talk) 13:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There is not a big problem with semi-protected articles, as articles such as Pizza and Spaghetti had been well-improved by TAFI yet they had been semi-ed during that time. However, you'll need to consider that fewer users may edit semi-protected articles, so perhaps think further whether a considerable amount of improvement can be done, rather than think that no semi-ed article may fit TAFI. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 06:34, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 32 of 2016
The selection for week 32 (starting 08 August 2016) is The Sims (video game).

Discussion (week 32)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''


 * I have blanked Today's articles for improvement/2016/32/picture – the previously specified File:Sims_NH.JPG is non-free, so can't be used per WP:NFCC - Evad37 &#91;talk] 11:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:The Sims Coverart.png be appropriate? My understanding of non-free content is it can be used to identify the subject, as we would be doing here, but nothing else. --CSJJ104 (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No, point 9 of WP:NFCCP policy restricts usage to articles - not project pages such as this page, nor user talk pages where TAFI messages are delivered. - Evad37 &#91;talk] <
 * In which case, would File:Logo of The Sims (2013).svg be acceptable? Otherwise I would suggest File:Selectedsim.jpg.--CSJJ104 (talk) 15:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Either of those would be acceptable - Evad37 &#91;talk] 04:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I would go File:Selectedsim.jpg as it is more accurate to the original game, which is what is required of the showing stuffs. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And you could put in a caption for that which shows about sims-like content. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 35 of 2016
The selection for week 35 (starting 29 August 2016) is Holy Spirit.

Discussion (week 35)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 36 of 2016
The selection for week 36 (starting 05 September 2016) is Wedding ring.

Discussion (week 36)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 37 of 2016
The selection for week 37 (starting 12 September 2016) is Education in Bangladesh.

Discussion (week 37)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 38 of 2016
The selection for week 38 (starting 19 September 2016) is Brain damage.

Discussion (week 38)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 39 of 2016
The selection for week 39 (starting 26 September 2016) is List of German painters.

Discussion (week 39)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

New article improvement drives
Check out the following new article improvement drives and contests. North America1000 11:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The 10,000 Challenge – aims to reach 10,000 article improvements for UK- and Ireland-related articles
 * WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge – aims to reach 10,000 article improvements for Africa-related articles

The TAFI article for Week 40 of 2016
The selection for week 40 (starting 03 October 2016) is Math rock.

Discussion (week 40)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 41 of 2016
The selection for week 41 (starting 10 October 2016) is Spelling bee.

Discussion (week 41)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 42 of 2016
The selection for week 42 (starting 17 October 2016) is Noise.

Discussion (week 42)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

TAFI notification
Either I have Brain damage or the new TAFI article has not been sent out (Week 39). I have not received a notification for this weeks TAFI selected article even though I am on that list.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Same. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 20:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Very weird. It seems like the notification has not been sent out to anyone on the list, for Week 39.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * --BabbaQ (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Last week MusikBot was upgraded to use the new authentication system, and that "system" didn't support mass messaging. I thought I reverted the change and reissued the messages, guess I didn't, sorry about that. You should get the notification for this week (will go out in about two hours from now). Best &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  22:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, it all worked out this week. Good work!--BabbaQ (talk) 00:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 43 of 2016
The selection for week 43 (starting 24 October 2016) is Attic.

Discussion (week 43)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 44 of 2016
The selection for week 44 (starting 31 October 2016) is Street food.

Discussion (week 44)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Images
Got ideas for images of Attic and Street Food? Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 45 of 2016
The selection for week 45 (starting 07 November 2016) is Sword dance.

Discussion (week 45)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 46 of 2016
The selection for week 46 (starting 14 November 2016) is Dress.

Discussion (week 46)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 47 of 2016
The selection for week 47 (starting 21 November 2016) is Sponge (material).

Discussion (week 47)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 48 of 2016
The selection for week 48 (starting 28 November 2016) is Homework.

Discussion (week 48)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 49 of 2016
The selection for week 49 (starting 05 December 2016) is Three-martini lunch.

Discussion (week 49)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 50 of 2016
The selection for week 50 (starting 12 December 2016) is Hoax.

Discussion (week 50)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

TAFI: Drunk again
diff --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series
The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate. North America1000 09:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Use   to invite others using this template.

Hope there is an Australia-NZ one. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 51 of 2016
The selection for week 51 (starting 19 December 2016) is Helena Bergström.

Discussion (week 51)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 52 of 2016
The selection for week 52 (starting 26 December 2016) is Tectonics.

Discussion (week 52)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 1 of 2017
The selection for week 1 (starting 02 January 2017) is Aeolian Islands.

Discussion (week 1)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 2 of 2017
The selection for week 2 (starting 09 January 2017) is Professional audio.

Discussion (week 2)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 3 of 2017
The selection for week 3 (starting 16 January 2017) is Organ (anatomy).

Discussion (week 3)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 4 of 2017
The selection for week 4 (starting 23 January 2017) is African nationalism.

Discussion (week 4)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 5 of 2017
The selection for week 5 (starting 30 January 2017) is Nvidia Shadowplay.

Discussion (week 5)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 6 of 2017
The selection for week 6 (starting 06 February 2017) is Secondary school.

Discussion (week 6)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 7 of 2017
The selection for week 7 (starting 13 February 2017) is Astronomical object.

Discussion (week 7)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 8 of 2017
The selection for week 8 (starting 20 February 2017) is Växjö.

Discussion (week 8)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 9 of 2017
The selection for week 9 (starting 27 February 2017) is Grey market.

Discussion (week 9)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 10 of 2017
The selection for week 10 (starting 06 March 2017) is Plastic explosive.

Discussion (week 10)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 11 of 2017
The selection for week 11 (starting 13 March 2017) is Tandoori chicken.

Discussion (week 11)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 12 of 2017
The selection for week 12 (starting 20 March 2017) is Bird of prey.

Discussion (week 12)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 13 of 2017
The selection for week 13 (starting 27 March 2017) is Technological evolution.

Discussion (week 13)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Plastic explosive improvements
I have some general familiarity with plastic explosives, but I am not sure what should even go in the article. Maybe an overview of the different types of plastic explosives, with a little blurb about each? Then it might be easier to back out a history since more will be written. Does that sounds good, and anything that should be included? Kees08 (talk) 06:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

The TAFI article for Week 14 of 2017
The selection for week 14 (starting 03 April 2017) is Synchrony and diachrony.

Discussion (week 14)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 15 of 2017
The selection for week 15 (starting 10 April 2017) is Corruption in the United States.

Discussion (week 15)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 16 of 2017
The selection for week 16 (starting 17 April 2017) is Page footer.

Discussion (week 16)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 17 of 2017
The selection for week 17 (starting 24 April 2017) is Gerald and Charlene Gallego.

Discussion (week 17)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

The TAFI article for Week 18 of 2017
The selection for week 18 (starting 01 May 2017) is Chthonic.

Discussion (week 18)
''Please any comments or concerns about the selection here. If three net members elect to reselect the article, then the article will be reselected and the former one removed from the list of articles.''

Cannabis-related collaboration for April 20?
I'm sure it's too late for this project to schedule a cannabis-related article for improvement for April 20 (see 420 (cannabis culture) if you're not familiar with the connection), but thought I'd post here to see if it would be possible to get a cannabis TAFI. If not, no worries! Project members are welcome to assist in the upcoming "420 collaboration" either way. Thanks for your consideration! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)