Wikipedia talk:Articles which are number one for one word Google searches

A fraud, a swindle
This page is a fraud, it fabricates its own predictions: If you write 'Henotheism' or whatever as an entry, you will obviously send lots of users to Google expecting to see 'Henotheism' as first result, and by clicking the link to check the entry they will inevitably bring it to that first position!. Gaianauta (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep. There are tons of lists on Wikipedia, and I think this is worthy. --Snafuu 22:10, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps a bot could create and maintain this list? --Oldak Quill 19:04, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
 * A bot could readily pull stuff from recent changes and do google searches on it. -- Vansig 01:29, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

I agree. There are lots of year-articles on WIkipedia that need listing, and it would be hard to put every year on manually. -- Freiberg 16:19, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Not Necessary
This page can be deleted. A bot should maintain it if this page is to exist. However, this list is not useful as an encyclopaedia entry. - Bnitin


 * It is not an encyclopaedia entry, as it is in the Wikipedia namespace. And it is interesting.  So it does not need to be deleted. --Henrygb 15:43, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Can I suggest an alternative to this page, which would be significantly shorter: Articles which are not number one for one word Google searches Kaid100 (talk) 18:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

MfD debate
This article survived a deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash talk 21:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)