Wikipedia talk:Assume good wraith

I love it
I shall watch this page... and contribute to it as well... for it is awesome. HAL2008 TK CT 04:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Awesome
What's next, Assume wood faith? Tree deities I tell you. Tyciol (talk) 07:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Best. Article. Idea. Ever. 79.112.55.97 (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

AGW could actually be applied to Wikipedia.
I'm sure some of our most devoted contributors (myself included) would gladly continue contributing post-mortem if permitted. Perhaps some already do? In that case, you can assume good faith and assume good wraith!!! :) Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Assume bad Wraith
Ghosts are evil soul eaters! 79.112.55.97 (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * necropost, but no they are very kind!!! Soulware2 (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

I have strong opinions on this.
so okay in theory this could have been a funny joke. the main pun at the heart of it is good! but the execution here is just garbage. the title is the only funny part, which wouldn't actually matter if the rest of the article wasn't full of attempts at comedy. ideally, this article would be imitating the tone of an actual wikipedia policy instead of like. whatever is going on here. because I cannot stress this enough every single joke in this article falls flat except for the one in the title, which is really good.jan Misali (talk) 06:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)