Wikipedia talk:Assume stupidity

Unnerstand, I donut (Yoduh)
Duh, I dont unnerstand this paeg?  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  14:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hahaha! ;D – Elisson • T • C • 14:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

sup girls check out my WP:ASS — Preceding unsigned comment added by MightofMue (talk • contribs) 16:05, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Note 2 tested
WP:Stupidity note 2 truthfulness confirmed.✅--Bsea (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

News untruth about Wikipedia and UK 2015 general elections, and what actually appended , , or you can check your self checking histories in those pages and the articles cited in the news for May 7, 2015, the election day.--Bsea (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

nutshell
I would like change the nutshell from:
 * Assume more than: people who work on the project do not have a clue about what they are doing.

to:
 * Assume people who work on the project do not have a clue about what they are doing, and furthermore have no way of acquiring one

The words "more than" seems to imply this but are hardly unambiguous, and therefore don't belong in a nutshell. My version is clearer and funnier. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 13:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

I love this page and I love Wikipedia
That's literally it. Then again everyone loves self-depreciation (especially me) so it makes sense. Thomasgilbertie (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)