Wikipedia talk:Bureaucrats/Archive 6

"User:Bureaucrat" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect User:Bureaucrat. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 30 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Crazy Boy  826  22:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Conversation
I would like to be in touch with Tiwa savage Fanes Kalumbwa (talk) 14:20, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately we do not have contact information about the people that are subjects of Wikipedia articles. The volunteers responding to messages to this address have no more information than that which is publicly available on Wikipedia. I regret that we are unable to assist further in this matter. Primefac (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

RfC: Bureaucrat activity
I have opened an RfC at: Village pump (policy). All are invited to participate. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:27, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Discussion archived 24 May 2020 without consensus (Village pump (policy)/Archive 157). –xenotalk 14:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

RFA Crat chat stats
Is there a page where 'crat chat stats are tallied/stored? If the 'crats have ever failed to promote an RFA candidate in a 'crat chat, I missed it, so wonder if it has ever happened. My perception is that once a candidate enters 'crat chat range, editors stop opposing as they know the 'crats always promote, so their !vote won't count. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  01:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * See . The immediately preceding section, "Outcomes", might also be of interest. (Yes, chats have failed to grant administrative privileges to requestors.) isaacl (talk) 02:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thx so much, Isaacl (is there anything you don't know ? :) Sandy Georgia (Talk)  02:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Re the "outcomes" section just above, do you know how the 50% stacks up to non-'crat chat passes, and particularly, how the 20% "under a cloud" and "for cause" compare to overall numbers? Sandy Georgia (Talk)  02:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I had a vague memory of seeing the table before so I just had a quick look from the RfA page. I have no idea what the stats are for admins generally (other than Worm That Turned stating at Requests for comment/Adminship term length that we lose about 50% of all admins in ten years, which works out to about 7% annual attrition). Given the extremely small number of cases that fall into the category in question, I wouldn't expect a close match in percentages with the general population of admins. isaacl (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree, having spent more time looking (not enough of a sample). I was just curious to examine my own confirmation bias, and of course the most negative of all the experiences from the last 5 years of the list tends to be what sticks in one's mind.  Thx again, Issacl. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  02:52, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Discussion about format of this page
For anyone not following WP:BN, a discussion has been started about potential changes to this page. Please feel free to voice your comments there. Primefac (talk) 14:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

No one east of GMT
not even CET (UTC+1/2). special:permalink/1132370952: 21 exist. only 4 do not state their timezones, and 1 of them lives in england. RZuo (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * So please convince others to run. -- Avi (talk) 11:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

removal of IP block exemption
What is the rationale for Bureaucrats being granted the ability to remove (but not add) IP block exemption? Crazynast 22:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I suspect it is a additional check on administrators - one can technically be a 'crat without being an admin, the latter of which being the only group that can grant IPBE. Primefac (talk) 08:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I think it is left over from ancient times, as a component of cleaning up after certain rename/merge operations. It's not really hurting anything, last time cleaning up local crat groups was thought about was prob in T140550 (2016) - but no one was really concerned with bothering with it. — xaosflux  Talk 19:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)