Wikipedia talk:CONSONANTS

What an awesome essay this is. --Doncram (talk) 02:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ...awesome :D   ——  SerialNumber  54129  16:00, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * "Real thing" is not a criteria in regard to deletion, though. We should be asking whether a high proportion of consonants is correlated with WP:V and WP:N. Based on this essay at this point in time, I'd say the sample size is too small. Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

The sample size might be small, but it's big enough to do a calculation;

This shows a correlation coefficient of −0.89. That is, a very strong anti-correlation. That is, exactly the opposite of the claimed effect – probability of existence goes down as the consonant density goes up. I suspect a bigger problem than the size of the sample is that it was not chosen at random. SpinningSpark 16:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You seem to be suggesting that better test of this hypothesis would involve random combinations of letters, and a calculation of whether random combinations with higher consonant density are more likely to produce words. All we need is a random letter-combination generator. Jack N. Stock (talk) 00:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * No, I'm suggesting the whole idea is a heap of dingo poo. SpinningSpark 16:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

zzz
Zzyzx (incredibly, a disambiguation page, as is Zzz and Xyzzy), Zzyzzyxx, and ZZZZZ all exist! SpinningSpark 16:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)