Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 27

Interesting how the "result" of the "Category: Disney villains" debate was to "merge" when there were five votes to merge and six votes to keep. 67.171.163.212 23:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You mean this one, right?
 * Looking at it of the 5 merge comments, 2 referred to reasonings in another discussion on the same page, 2 reference precedent, 2 gave specific reasons (similar but differently worded), and one used "per nom". There is some over lap as 2 fall under 2 categories. For the 6 keep comments, 3 gave specific reasons (similar but differently worded), 2 used "as per..." and that was it, and 1 boiled down to "Nom doesn't like it but I do."
 * At a rough guess at how the closing Admin evaluated it:
 * Merge between 3.5 and 4.5
 * Keep 3
 * Keep in mind the Admin isn't supposed to "count votes" they are supposed to evaluate the debate. Given that there were 6 noms up for 25 cats, the Admin may have looked at all of them.
 * Also, one of the other 5 include 7 Disney sub-cats. So again, there is something more the Admin may have been looking at.
 * — J Greb 00:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)