Wikipedia talk:Content legality

An alternative policy is being discussed here: Policy on private photos of identifiable models HighInBC 15:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The idea behind this policy reiterate existing policies in the beleif that consensus can handle these things, but a policy is needed to point out so the submiter will not feel singled out. Please feel free to edit this, be bold, and seek consensus. HighInBC 15:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Extremely vague
I can't see any argument in which this could not be brought up. The current phrasing has no meaning. As a guideline, it does not guide. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree, but I find this whole dispute to be very vauge, I am simply trying to create something that would have avoided the Publicgirluk contreversy without excessive policy creep. Perhaps it is too little? HighInBC 13:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * We clearly need a specific policy, I agree with you there, but I'm afraid there isn't much specific that's been decided yet that we can write up. Unfortunately, I do think the lawyers need to weigh in. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Agreed, I await their response. HighInBC 14:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)