Wikipedia talk:Contents/Human activities

Why is 'Underwater Diving' a top level human activity?
I appreciate the significance of underwater diving, but it simply does no belong among topics like philosophy, war, and art. The scope is too narrow and (no offense to underwater diving-enthusiasts) it has not had the same impact on the human timeline as the topics it's listed with. 'Exploration' would be a suitable replacement if the author feels that underwater diving is not included in entertainment, science, and sport. At least exploration is broad enough in scope that its impact on human history can easily be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.238.163 (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)