Wikipedia talk:Contributor copyright investigations/Dr. Blofeld

Is this worth continuing?
I appreciate all the efforts of the CCI team, but I just skimmed through a handful of the results pages on this review and it seems that relatively few, if any, infringements are being found. If that impression is correct, and given the number of other pending matters, I have to ask if this page-by-page investigation really needs to be completed. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I would say no, we should probably close it.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , there are a few CCIs that I feel might not be worth the effort (Like Aldebaran69 or Gryffindor, although I'll still finish them), but I feel like it's best if this one is completely closed. There's been a lot of long running drama around this case, including a declined arb case and a large AN discussion where everyone chimed in, and I feel like it's best thoroughly cleared out. True, not many violations have been discovered, as most of the listed articles are single sentence stubs- I'd say about less than 5% of listed articles had violations- but we've come this far, and this was once the biggest CCI ever. Actually wiping it out, and completely clearing the name of one of our biggest contributors, can only do good. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 02:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)