Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Archives/2021/May

Request the restoration of Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier
I cannot ask the protective administrator to review the proposed new content for the page, ensuring that I have adequate independent and reliable sources to meet the notoriety requirements set out in the general notoriety guide or other appropriate specific guide, because the administrator  has died, so it is impossible to contact him .... then I raise the matter here in the delete review, being careful to quote the exact name of the page "Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier". The reasons why I think the page should be created now is to have found new independent references of notoriety of the author and these are good reasons to seek review. In this reference of El Museo de Las Encartaciones is the work of this author collected in the cultural heritage, Heritage Fund: Preserved Heritage, see here. I demonstrate that the previous concerns are no longer a problem.--Detoxtu (talk) 20:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You should check with the admin who deleted the page (post a note at User talk:Vanamonde93). (For the record: deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier).--RegentsPark (comment) 01:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

At some point, I noticed that Wikipedia's notability criteria (WP:ARTIST) says that a person is (likely) notable enough for an article if they are included in several museum collection.

The administrator removed the page based on criteria (WP: ARTIST) and lack of reference from independent sources. This administrator has died and I cannot contact him.

Searching I found what the admin was requesting, independent source reference and notability criteria (WP: ARTIST), see here:. Those previous concerns are no longer a problem. In The Museum of Las Encartaciones you can find the work of this author included in the Cultural Heritage, Heritage Fund: Preserved Heritage.

Since Administrator has died and protected the page, now I don't know who to turn to. Greetings and thanks.--Detoxtu (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Also for the record: Sockpuppet investigations/Sorginak. That's a rude shock about Slim Virgin/Sarah, though – I didn't know. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this is where I learned about Sarah also. Very sorry to hear. Hobit (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This article has been recreated several times (with variations of the artist's name) by a ring of disruptive sockpuppets. It was also spammed across-wikis in several languages (some of which have been deleted). Netherzone (talk) 17:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)