Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Header

Serious problems
The problems are pretty obvious. The whole thing seriously misstates both deletion policy and undeletion policy. To claim that it's been arrived at by consensus is to state a very palpable untruth. --Tony Sidaway Talk 01:05, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Aaron, do please stop being unreasonable. You've twice falsely claimed that I should use the talk page or block you for 3RR. Since you've come nowhere near to breaking the 3RR, and I have no intention of doing so, and I have used the talk page whereas you have simply taunted me in edit summaries, it's becoming utterly surreal. I'll have another go at reformulating a policy-compatible version of the wording here. Do please try to discuss instead of edit warring/ --Tony Sidaway Talk 01:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Please address my points, Aaron. Putting a redirect over my requests will not make them go away. --Tony Sidaway Talk  01:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Why has this page been un-redirected? And what's with the odd edit summary? "Reverting blanking that was performed by redirection to another talk page" ?!? As opposed to that other kind of re-directing that leaves the whole page intact? Ook? At the time this page was redirect, all the material on the talk page was copied to the DRV talk page. Split and repeated discussions are harmfull, etc etc. Why should this template, which only serves to keep the DRV page tidy, not be discussed there? I'm struggling to find a motivation here that's not about "setting the scene" in some way with regards to the ongoing arbitration. - brenneman  {T}  {L}  05:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)